United Nations Conference on the Future - 22nd and 23rd of September 2024. Complete digital control without borders

Towards an “Oppressive New Digital World Order”. UN Conference “World for the Future”. 22-23 September 2024. Borderless enslavement package, digital control of 8 billion people

In less than two weeks, the United Nations will present the World of the Future during a special session – 22 and 23 September – of its 2024 annual UN meeting in New York. This is a completely digitalised world. For the UN GA meeting, the governments of Germany and Namibia have prepareda global digitalisation “package” . Naturally, with the “help” of Big Tech and Big Finance.

By Peter Koenig, Global Research, 11 September 2024

This digital enslavement package will be adopted with the near-total exclusion of the public, of people like you and me.

Apparently, most parliaments and governments around the world have already agreed to it, so the presentation and so-called discussion during the UN Annual Conference is a mere fig leaf, a farce.

This is the new “rules-based” way of forcing an entire population into a compact digital straitjacket from which it is almost impossible to escape.

Nowhere have people been consulted or even informed. Governments around the world have been forced by anonymous powers to accept a complete digitisation of our future – what the WEF calls the ^4th Industrial Revolution.

Guys, it’s here!

There’s no need to wait for the end of the UN’s 2030 Agenda. The objectives have already been conveniently put forward. You – and I – will be faced with the elimination of money, which has already begun in many European countries and, to some extent, in the USA; and even in some “developing countries” like India, without people’s consent.

Everything will be controlled: our spending of money, health data, eating habits, travelling, viewer preferences, radio preferences, the friends we meet and communicate with regularly, as well as others from the opposition camp, buying and spending habits, etc., everything will be digitally controlled by the digital corporate control system.

For more information, see this article (in German).

The means to do this is the benign-looking QR code, which has been introduced gradually and smoothly over the last two decades – and which has now become a common presence in our daily lives. In many cases, you may not be able to read a restaurant menu without downloading it into your personal QR code.

Who do you think is going to control all the personal QR codes?

Exactly, you guessed right.

QR stands for Quick Response. It’s a barcode on steroids. While the barcode retains information horizontally, the QR code does so both horizontally and vertically. The two-dimensional matrix barcode was invented in 1994 by the Japanese company Denso Wave, originally intended for labelling car parts.

Western control freaks quickly discovered its potential and captured it for their evil“programme for the future of mankind“, leaving it to the corporate IT world (with a combined value of around 3 to 4 trillion dollars) to administer and impose it on humanity. An individual QR code has basically unlimited storage capacity. It can therefore know you better than you know yourself.

A message of hope from Archbishop Vigano

The debate or “negotiations” for this digital pact officially took place on 20 and 21 September behind closed doors during the UNGA, but the context had been discussed and agreed in several clandestine iterations, also called Revisions 2 and 3, which are published on the UN website for “The Summit of the Future”. Check it out.

Unfortunately, hardly anyone knows about this page and even fewer read it. If people were better and more informed, or if they bothered to inform themselves, perhaps we wouldn’t be facing the digital abyss as we are today.

It’s not clear what representation from business/IT and civil society was part of these secret “negotiations”. But it is certain that the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the Club of Rome, both based in “paradisiacal” Switzerland(it cannot be repeated enough how “neutral” Switzerland is home to most of these evil organisations, whose aim is to reduce and control humanity), took part in the original drafting and subsequent revisions.

The digital pact has no room for human choice. There is no possibility of a “voluntary option”. In other words, an individual cannot say: “Thanks, but no thanks, I prefer not to participate in this digital world”. People are forced into this system no matter what. That’s the plan.

Governments’ choice to participate has also been blocked, because they’ve been told it’s an obligation, or else. We know what “or else” means.

No exceptions are allowed in “total digitalisation” because they would throw global control, or Globalist Control, out of the window, or to the wolves, so to speak.

Exceptions would be a definite obstacle to the imminent One World Order.

The pact clearly explains the enormous advantages that digital technologies offer to human well-being. It is therefore imperative that there are no gaps between people and countries, that EVERYONE is travelling on the same wavelength – not least digitally.

The goal of global human well-being, as explained in the pact – no wars, no conflicts, no pollution, no noise, diseases under control, etc. – justifies the rapid move towards total digitalisation or ALL digitalisation.

Without saying it outright, this is the first step towards a One World Order and a One World Government. The latter executed by the UN, with a political framework established by the WEF and a GESTAPO-type tyranny imposed by the WHO.

The UN was fully co-opted into this humanity-destroying endeavour which, in retrospect, can be traced back over the last 20-something years, while humanity was lulled into a deep sleep. It was finally made official with a Cooperation Agreement between the UN and the WEF, signed in June 2019. Illegal as such, since the UN cannot enter into agreements with NGOs, but de facto irrelevant in a world ordered by rules.

What’s more, the UN’s resources and budget, which currently depend mainly on contributions from member countries, could easily be replaced by the dominant paymasters, Big Tech and Big Finance, who will end up calling the shots. Deservedly so in today’s world, where“who pays decides” mandates.

Future annual meetings of the United Nations could be considered pro-forma shareholder meetings or, in WEF terms, “stakeholder meetings”, without actually having any power to change direction or chart a different, more humane course.

Digital Management is in control, with the voiceless (trans)humanity following almost blindly. Those who aren’t blind and can resist can easily be digitally removed. Nobody cares. Mr “digital” cannot be accused of murder. The rules-based order has no concept of murder; it is simply a digital disappearance.

In the ranks of the consultancy services closest to the UN, we can expect to find the big IT companies. They will be deciding the digital directions, as they are given the script by the so far unnamed Big Finance.

Do we, humanity, have a choice, an alternative, a way out of this digital stranglehold? We do, but only when we realise what is being planned, when we recognise the implications and when we act not as individuals, but when we are ready to abandon the individualism “imposed by the system” and adopt “Together we Can“.

Click on the share button below to send this article by email or to forward it to your friends and colleagues. Follow us on Instagram and Twitter and subscribe to our Telegram channel. Feel free to repost and share Global Research articles widely.

Get your free copy of “Towards a World War III Scenario:The Dangers of Nuclear War”!

Peter Koenig is a geopolitical analyst and former senior economist at the World Bank and the World Health Organisation (WHO), where he worked for more than 30 years around the world. He is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed; and co-author of Cynthia McKinney’s book “When China Sneezes: From the Coronavirus Lockdown to the Global Politico-Economic Crisis” (Clarity Press – 1 November 2020).

Peter is a research associate at the Centre for Research on Globalisation (CRG). He is also a non-resident senior fellow at the Chongyang Institute of Renmin University in Beijing.

Featured image: United Nations General Assembly Hall in New York (Licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0)

The original source of this article is Global Research